In the recent decision in AB Stable VIII LLC v. Maps Hotels and Resorts One LLC by the Delaware Court of Chancery, that court considered a buyer’s right to terminate a proposed share purchase following the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak.
The sale and purchase agreement (SPA) exchanged by the parties included the following conditions, which were required to be met before the buyer would be obliged to complete the purchase:
- The following representation must remain accurate between exchange and completion: That there had not been any changes, events or developments that have had or would reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect (MAE Condition).
- The following seller covenant must have been complied with between exchange and completion: That the business of the target company and its subsidiaries would be conducted only in the ordinary course of business, consistent with past practice in all material respects (Ordinary Course Covenant).
The court held that the MAE Condition had not been breached as the pandemic fell outside of the SPA’s definition of a Material Adverse Effect, which excluded effects resulting from “natural disasters and calamities.” However, it found that the target group’s response to the outbreak constituted a breach of the Ordinary Course Covenant as extensive changes were made to the business in order to cope with the challenging circumstances. The business was not, therefore, conducted in the ordinary course, consistent with past practice in all material respects.
Although the decision was made in Delaware, in the recent case of Travelport Ltd v Wex Inc (which we reported here), the English High Court drew heavily on case law from the Delaware Courts when considering the construction of a material adverse change clause in an agreement. It will be interesting to see if the English courts will now also follow the Delaware courts strict approach when considering ordinary course of business covenants in deals being done during the pandemic.
 (Nov. 30, 2020)
  EWHC 2670 (Comm)